CAREER EDUCATION. What skills would I leave out my Resume?

I am currently working as an employee of courtesy to a big chain grocery store. Duties are quite humble, and I have been there since May 2001.
Bag of groceries for customers, I take them to their cars as needed, clean up spills when necessary, put the item back on the shelves and bring back the central collection point. My wife says I should leave this position out my resume, but if I do then it seems that I have not worked since the year 2000. What is your recommendation on this?
My advice: don't leave good jobs as this outside the application. The advantage of him, however, will depend on how you frame. Describing it as seen above, probably wouldn't mean much for a company you are applying to? unless there was another store, maybe.
But let's say in language that will understand every employer:
You mean you were the public face of your company?
The first contact and initial perception of the company for all customers?
You mean that you understand how important it is the first experience of a client with a business can be?
After all? If customers are to be turned off, then you have no business!
You mean you're an expert in giving customers what they want? Namely ... helping people with their food?
Showing them in various parts of the store? You are so good at anticipating customer needs, which can sometimes seem as if you have ESP?
You mean that you are an expert in & go the extra mile making sure experience customers in your shop has been as comfortable as possible ... so that it would return more often and tell others about the archive? (From here? more profit for the business.)
I could go on and on ... but I hope that you get the point. Absolutely no work experience or work can be transformed into excellent reasons to hire me. You just have to be able to speak in the language of the employer. And you will get the job!
Now? lets talk about why they were working in an unrelated field, as the shop in the first place. It was to get some experience of life right? (If you wassn 't now!)
You wanted to see how other industries worked and find out if [Insert industry you want to move] was the right thing for you ... here is the key ... If the rule of law for your employer, too!. You don't want to be some "wet behind the ears" University or college graduate begging for a job in [Insert industry] that you want to move] ...
I hope this gives you some food for thought!

Read More

CAREER EDUCATION. Leave on good terms: save regret

The exit interview is not a time to burn bridges with your old company. It has become a very common throughout corporate America, and the idea behind it is to discover from departing staff members, when they no longer have to worry about protecting jobs, exactly what things at the company can be improved.
The interview is deigned to be a tool to make a business more efficient and a better place to work. However, many employees who are leaving an organization using this as a time to vent frustrations that you felt. They see it as a personal gripe session and loose inhibitions, sometimes venting personal ad homonym attacks against collaborators and especially against the bosses and former supervisors.
This is never a wise idea. Dale Carnegie and other personal growth guru told businessmen for many years which is never good to burn bridges and offend someone when you could easily avoid. This is the old saying, "you can catch more flies with honey than vinegar". Keep in mind that saying before the interview. Remember that if you make personal attacks will be seen as such by people who have read the report of the interview. If you have any suggestions for improvement, genuine your case might be weakened by making personal attacks. I really do not gain anything from attack or bad mouthing people was used to work with or work for anyway, and you may regret saying something in anger later when you're thinking more clearly.
Use the interview as a constructive tool, with good intentions. The company who is accustomed to work, after all, provide a way of earning a living for the time spent with them. Granted, provided services to them that they needed. And, it paid a salary or wages. We hope that was a fair exchange. If you have honest concerns, the interview can be constructive. For example, a journalist for a local weekly newspaper, pointed out that the computers used were old and updated, and that the firewall software used was ineffective. The system had suffered attacks of computer viruses in the past, and it was obvious the reporter that the editor was not enough computer literato figuring out how to solve the problem. The reporter knew that the Publisher and business manager would have both read the interview report output, so she carefully and diplomatically made his comments, showing that the purchase of new computers and new software would save the newspaper in the long run. Carefully formulated by it during his exit interview took his ideas among competent persons, and take his comments seriously because he had nothing to gain and nothing to lose and it seemed to be reported this situation for the good of the newspaper and personal. In this way, the interview release benefited all concerned.

Read More